
I was trying to keep on writing my tesina, that thing I used to call The beast in the closet. Why? because whenever I want to finish it I start reacting emotionally to it, as an actor would do, and not as a student of English Literature.
I suddenly made this association of
Blasted with
Endgame a year ago, but I didn't want to approach it I don't know why.
I went to see
Endgame a couple of months ago at the Barbican, and Clov was performed by a little man, who was actually a dwarf. Not very long ago I read an article by Salman Rushdie on Samuel Becket in Bookforum. And I wanted to post something about it but then time passed by and I never did. But here I am, writing now. Rushdie says:
Beckett, not Molloy, attempts the impossible: viz; to write of death, of the end of ends, the ending that ends the future as well as the other tenses, the past imperfect, the present subjunctive, the present indicative, the pluperfect, and to do so using the tool not of prophesy but of memory.
And about endings, Clov says:
Clov: (As before) I say to myself – sometimes Clov, you must learn to suffer better than that if you want them to weary of punishing you – one day. I say to myself – sometimes Clov, you must be there better than that if you want them to let you go – one day. But I feel too old, and too far to form new habits. Good, it’ll never end, I’ll never go. (Pause) Then one day, suddenly it ends, it changes, I don’t understand, it dies, or it’s me, I don’t understand that either. I ask the words that remain – sleeping, waking, morning, evening. They have nothing to say. (Pause.) I open the door of the cell and go. I’m so bowed I only see my feet, if I open my eyes, and between my legs a little trail of black dust. I say to myself that the earth is extinguished, though I never saw it lit. (Pause.) It’s easy going. (Pause.) When I fall I weep for happines.
Why Beckett? And how? And and and? Why does it hurt so fucking much?